Many experts in the golf industry feel that the distance modern golf professionals are hitting the ball is having a negative effect on the game. For example, golf courses now must be significantly longer to challenge top players and not all facilities have the resources to make this accommodation.
Some experts say the ball technology must be dialed back in addition to more restrictive rules on the design of clubs. Critics of this strategy make the point that the game is very difficult for the average player and therefore dialing back the equipment is unfair to the average player and will hurt the growth of the game.
As a result, some are in favor of having two sets of rules regarding equipment for elite players and average players. While I am not opposed to the concept of having separate rules for professionals and elite level amateurs, it gets very complicated when deciding where to draw the line and what restrictions should be put in place.
Perhaps the simplest and most logical suggestion I have heard so far came from six-time major champion, Sir Nick Faldo. He posed the question “what would happen if players were not allowed to tee the ball up?”.
Rule 6.2 covers playing the ball from the tee area and states in part “the ball must be played from either: a tee placed in or on the ground, or the ground itself.” What if a local rule could be adopted that required players to play the ball from the ground when teeing off? In my opinion, this would significantly reduce the distance that current players achieve from the teeing ground with a modern ball and a modern driver. One of the secrets to achieving these distances is to strike the ball while the club is traveling level to the ground or slightly on the upswing while simultaneously contacting the ball at or just above the center of the club face. This type of impact produces high launch/low spin conditions which maximizes distance.
With the ball on the ground, players would need to hit slightly down on the ball, with more loft, to achieve the most consistent results. To do this, the player would give up maximum distance.
For tournament organizers wishing to dial back driving distances, it seems to me this would be a great place to start. This would eliminate the need for new rules about ball or club specifications or what is or is not confirming equipment. Players could still use any club they want to, but most would end up teeing off with a fairway wood or with a specially designed driver with a smaller head and more loft than they would use when allowed to tee the ball up.
In recreational or club level competitions, organizers would have the option of not invoking this rule and allowing players to place their ball on the tee. Unlike dialing back, the balls or clubs, the average golfer is left unaffected.
The Bent Brook family is thrilled to announce our participation in the 2023 PGA Works Collegiate Championship. Heralded as the most culturally significant championship in collegiate golf, the PWCC features golfers from Historically Black Colleges and Universities and other Minority Serving Institutions. In conjunction with Shoal Creek Club, Bent Brook will co-host over 200 athletes from diverse backgrounds all over the country. The PWCC has a long-standing tradition of opening doors to the game of golf and impacting the lives of the participating student athletes and Bent Brook is excited to be a part of that effort as we share our course with these players. We invite you to read the entire press release below.
FRISCO, Texas (May 17, 2022) – The PGA of America today announced that Shoal Creek Club and Bent Brook Golf Course, both outside Birmingham, Alabama, will host the 2023 PGA WORKS Collegiate Championship (PWCC), May 8-10.
The PWCC, the most culturally significant championship in collegiate golf, features Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) and other Minority Serving Institutions (MSI) from all over the country. More than 200 student-athletes representing approximately 30 teams, along with 52 individuals, will compete in five divisions.
The PWCC was founded in 1986 by the National Negro Golf Association when HBCUs did not have the same postseason opportunities as other institutions. Today, the Championship retains its founding vision to open doors for student-athletes from HBCUs and MSIs as well as other athletes from diverse backgrounds.
“The PWCC is an influential Championship that goes beyond the golf course, so it is important to the PGA of America that we have a host site that understands its importance in collegiate golf and its long-term effects on these student-athletes,” PGA CEO Seth Waugh said. “Shoal Creek and Bent Brook fit the bill, and we are excited to head to Alabama where the athletes, the Championship and venues can be showcased.”
In conjunction with the PWCC, PGA WORKS will host Beyond the Green, a career-exploration event designed to educate and inspire talent from historically underrepresented backgrounds to pursue careers in the golf industry and to understand the important role golf can play in their careers overall. The event will be held May 7, 2023.
In addition to providing a first-class venue for the PWCC, Shoal Creek and its membership have committed to helping support the PGA WORKS HBCU Golf Scholarship endowment, with 50% of those funds staying in Alabama. The PGA WORKS HBCU Golf Scholarship endowment has been created to provide men’s and women’s golf scholarships to underfunded HBCU and MSI institutions in an effort to sustain those programs for the long-term.
“Shoal Creek is honored to host the 2023 PWCC. We look forward to welcoming student-athletes from across the country representing HBCU and MSI men’s and women’s collegiate golf programs,” said Shoal Creek Club president Greg King. “These young men and women are tremendous ambassadors of the game and truly represent the positive impact it can have on a young person’s life. We are thrilled with the opportunity to bring such a prestigious and significant event to Shoal Creek and the great state of Alabama.”
“Alabama is home to 15 HBCUs, making it the state with the most in the country,” added Bent Brook owner Jimmy Lee. “It is an honor to join PGA WORKS and Shoal Creek in hosting the PWCC. The Bent Brook Golf Course is looking forward to welcoming all teams and student-athletes to this historic event.”
The Championship is also a point of pride for the city of Birmingham and its mayor, who graduated from Morehouse College, an HBCU in Atlanta.
“We’re proud to host the 2023 PGA WORKS Collegiate Championship here in our city, and we’re even more proud that HBCU student-athletes will have an opportunity to compete at one of the most beautiful golf courses in our state,” said Birmingham Mayor Randall Woodfin. “As an HBCU graduate myself, I’m excited that the PGA and Shoal Creek are creating more inclusive spaces for minority golfers while providing scholarships to student-athletes. This is a great step in the right direction.”
Shoal Creek is a Jack Nicklaus design that opened in 1977. It has hosted the 1984 and 1990 PGA Championships, the U.S. Amateur (1986), the U.S. Junior Amateur (2008) and the U.S. Women’s Open (2018), among other events. It is currently ranked among the top courses in the U.S. by both Golf Digest and Golf.com.
About PGA WORKS PGA WORKS is a strategic initiative designed to diversify the golf industry’s workforce. Funded as one of the pillars of PGA REACH, the 501(c)(3) charitable foundation of the PGA of America, PGA WORKS leverages fellowships, scholarships, career exploration events, and the PGA WORKS Collegiate Championship to inspire and engage talent from all backgrounds to pursue key employment positions across the golf industry. For more information, visit PGAREACH.org.
About PGA REACH PGA Foundation, Inc. d/b/a PGA REACH is the 501(c)(3) charitable foundation of the PGA of America. The mission of PGA REACH is to positively impact the lives of youth, military and diverse populations by enabling access to PGA Professionals, PGA Sections and the game of golf. For more information, visit PGAREACH.org and follow @PGAREACH on Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn and Facebook.
When it comes to champion golfers, who is the greatest of all time?
Granted it is difficult to compare golfers from different eras. Differences in equipment, course conditions, travel, strength of the competition, opportunities to compete etc. are all factors that make objective comparison impossible.
Historically the gold standard for comparison is a player’s record in the major championships: The Masters, United States Open, Open Championship (aka British Open) and the PGA Championship.
By this standard, two players stand far above the rest: Jack Nicklaus and Tiger Woods.
In the history of golf, only 5 men have completed the so-called “Career Grand Slam,” by winning each of these championships at least 1 time: Gene Sarazen, Ben Hogan, Jack Nicklaus, Gary Player and Tiger Woods.
Jack and Tiger are the only players to have multiple victories in each of these championships, having won each of them at least 3 times.
For me, the discussion of who is the greatest comes down to these 2 players, and by a narrow margin I give the nod to Jack for the following reasons:
Total Major Championship Victories: Jack has 18 to Tiger’s 15.
Major Championship Runners-Up: Jack has 19 to Tiger’s 7.
Of these 19 runners-up, Jack finished within 2 strokes of the eventual winner 13 times. By comparison Tiger has 7 career runners-up where he finished within 2 stokes 5 times.
In other words, Jack came much closer to winning a potential 4th, 5th or even 6th career grand slam.
3. Jack beat more great players in his era.
During the period when he won all but 1 of his majors (1962-1980), Jack competed against Gary Player (who also won a career slam) plus 4 other Hall of Fame players who completed 3 legs of the grand slam: Arnold Palmer, Lee Trevino, Raymond Floyd and Tom Watson. These 5 champions won a total of 34 major championships.
During the period when Tiger dominated major championship golf (1997-2008), only one player, Phil Mickelson (6 major wins) completed 3 legs of the grand slam.
This is my argument for Jack Nicklaus as the G.O.A.T.
Also, we must consider the possibility that Tiger is not finished.
Everyone already knows who the next Arnold, Jack or Tiger is. It’s some young person being introduced to the game by an adult family member, coach or volunteer. Let’s face it … kids just can’t pick up golf aroud the playground and every kid that is fortunate enough to be exposed to golf is not going to be the next GOAT – or even make the PGA Tour, for that matter. Teaching young people the game a golf has value well beyond making a team or getting a scholarship. Introducing a child to golf has many outstanding benefits which include:
It is a sport they can enjoy for many years, perhaps the rest of their life.
It will provide you with an opportunity as a parent, or grandparent, to spend countless hours of quality time with your child.
Even if they never play competitively, at some point in their adult life your child will probably benefit from knowing how to play golf. Regardless of what career they choose opportunities to play some type of “customer golf” will likely arise. If they are unable to participate, it will not be helpful to their career.
There is no “one size fits all” approach to getting a child started in golf. Children of different ages and athletic abilities will require different strategies. In addition, not everyone has the same resources regarding time and money. Having said that, I would like to offer general advice on getting your child started.
Give your child the opportunity to explore golf, but do not push if there is no interest at all on their part.
Particularly for children ages 6 and under, you can gauge their interest with minimal investment. I would recommend going to www.uskidsgolf.com and buying an entry level training club appropriate for your child’s height. This is a lightweight club with an oversized head to make contact with the ball easier. It also has a molded training grip and comes with limited flight golf balls that can be used in the yard. For an investment of about $50 you can get your young child off to a positive start and determine if further involvement in the game is warranted.
Do not over coach younger children. Focus on letting them have fun.
For children who show a keen interest, invest in proper equipment as your budget will allow. Perhaps the biggest mistake made in this area is having kids play with adult clubs, even if they have been cut down to appropriate lengths. If your child is using clubs that are too long and/or too heavy for them, learning proper swing mechanics will be compromised.
Once again, www.uskidsgolf.com can be an excellent resource. They have lightweight clubs in a wide variety of lengths, fitted based on height, which will give your child an excellent chance to learn good mechanics from the outset.
Unless you are an accomplished player knowledgeable about golf, I highly recommend seeking a qualified PGA or LPGA Professional to guide your child’s development. Here at Bent Brook, we offer individual instruction for junior golfers in addition to our outstanding PGA Junior League Golf Program for both boys and girls ages 9-13.
If you would like more information or would like to ask specific questions about junior golf, please contact me at 205-424-2368 or via email at msmith@bentbrook.com.
The rules of golf have changed and now allow players to leave the flagstick in the hole when putting with no penalty. Additionally, many golf courses required golfers to keep the flagstick in the hole last year due to Covid-19 concerns. Therefore, most golfers have gotten used to the idea of leaving it in.
Now that most course now allow players the option once again, it begs the question: Which is better, flagstick in or out?
Tom Mase, Ph.D, a professor of mechanical engineering at California Polytechnic State University and member of the Golf Digest Technical Panel, conducted a study to analyze the effect of the flagstick on putts.
Dr. Mase conducted his testing with college golfers and the use of a putting machine called the Perfect Putter. A variety of flagsticks were tested rolling putts designed for center and off-center impacts.
Putts were also rolled at a variety of speeds, designed to carry the ball anywhere from 2.5 feet to 12 feet past the holes.
For putts rolling 2.5 feet past the hole, the results showed no advantage or disadvantage to leaving the flagstick in.
For putts rolling 4.5 feet past the hole, all putts hitting dead-center went in, with or without the flagstick. However, leaving the flagstick had a negative effect on off-center putts. The number of putts made without the flagstick was double the number made with it left in.
All dead-center putts went in, with or without the flagstick, even when rolled hard enough to go up to 8 feet past the hole. Leaving the flagstick in was only beneficial for putts rolling between 9 and 12 feet past the hole.
Others have hypothesized that leaving the flagstick in on long putts would provide a visual benefit. The testing conducted by Dr. Mase with elite college players on this hypothesis was inconclusive.
While further and perhaps more in-depth studies on this subject will likely be done, this data suggests the following strategy on the greens:
If you face a long, fast putt where there is a risk of rolling the ball way past and you are content to 2-putt, Ieaving the flagstick in is probably a good idea. However, on any putt you are trying to hole, you should take the flagstick out or have it attended.
